Watching Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown’s campaign director talk  about their campaign strategies earlier this summer made me realize that  something really profound was taking place in our country.
As he  detailed all of the innovations their campaign used to try and convince  people to vote for their candidate I couldn’t help but wonder why it was  so difficult to get people out to vote, an activity that is most  certainly in their own best interest. And then I took that question one  step further - why is so much time, energy and money spent attempting to  convince people to do things that are in their best interest?
Whether  it is a get out the vote campaign, public service ads telling people to  stop smoking or to eat healthier, government mandated programs that  force people to save money (which the majority wouldn’t do otherwise) or  any other host of initiatives aimed at bettering people’s lives - Why  is this costly practice of convincing necessary? Why don’t people know  they should vote, know they should eat healthy or know they should be  responsible with their money?
In a rare, and hopefully not  precedent-setting, occurrence I actually would like to answer the  question I raise. And I believe that the answer, sadly, is that these  values, though perhaps once of import to our culture, and certainly  valued in some sub-cultures or other parts of the world, are just not  part of our process of socialization anymore.
For some strange  reason, being raised in this country doesn’t guarantee you will  understand the stock market, marketing and financial decisions, how to  choose a healthy diet, how to exercise your political rights much less  global economic and political dynamics.
Schools incessantly pound  facts into young people while imparting very few, if any, practical  skills or critical thinking concepts, not in a dissimilar fashion to Ray  Bradbury predictions in Fahrenheit 451. True, many kids can do math at a  level that would have surely categorized them as a witch in the not too  distant past, but have they the same ability to question the world  around them or an understanding of the complex and serious issues that  they will have to grapple with throughout their lives?
If  anything, school curricula have become even narrower because of the  monumental over-standardization that has taken place over the past  decade. The focus of our public education seems to have shifted from  helping educate and socialize our youngest to just measuring the  ‘quality’ of schools as to determine next year’s federal funding.
The  idea of socialization, whereby the eldest help teach the youngest how  best to survive and develop in a given environment is an incredible  process. Humans spend more time on this process than any other animal by  far. Our youngest today spend often 18 years or more under supervision,  far greater than even our mammal relatives like dogs who spend only a  few months or dolphins, perhaps the closest, who spend 3-6 years. This  enormous focus humans have had on raising offspring is one of the  primary reasons we have such robust culture - an incredible amount of  information is passed from generation to generation, even before written  or recorded materials existed.   And now that we have such accesible  and global mediums to record and share information, we should be able to  further improve upon this practice.
For the first time in human  history, we have unprecedented opportunity (resources and incentive) to  enter into an entirely new level of thought, discourse and freedom.  Critical thinking combined with vast and easy access to information is a  powerful tool of democracy, science and thought that we have yet to tap  into fully.
Perhaps we would not need so many complicated laws  around financial markets if people simply were too well educated about  finances to be tricked into poor decisions. Or if we had a better  understanding of our bodies and diets we would no longer need the  government to intervene for us. And if we could better engage with  public policy issues, we wouldn’t need voter registration drives or  overly-complicated (and ineffective) election rules.
Instead of  attempting to solve all of these problems by creating cumbersome  government interventions after the problem has arisen, we should, as a  culture, take a more proactive approach and re-shape our education and  enculturalization processes to better prepare people to make these  decisions themselves.
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment